Understand the risks before you agree.
ContractIQ helps legal, commercial and procurement teams identify unclear obligations, missing protections and practical risk in draft agreements. Findings point to the clause evidence so people can make an informed decision before signature.
Evidence-backed review prompts. A human decides what to accept, clarify or escalate.
A broader view of contract risk
Review the agreement as a decision, not just a document. Surface scope, dependencies, payment mechanics, remedies, liability, renewal, termination and data obligations that may affect the deal after signature.
Supplier, customer and bundle reviews each ask different questions. Choose the perspective that matches the decision and then validate the result against the complete context.
- Legal: locate wording that needs interpretation or escalation.
- Commercial: test whether obligations, price and remedies match the deal.
- Procurement: trace supplier commitments, dependencies and exit assumptions.
- Operational management: assess delivery commitments, service levels, timescales, dependencies and resource implications before agreement.
- Contract management: check obligation ownership, reporting, change controls, escalation, notice provisions and renewal arrangements before handover.
Just as useful after the ink has dried
Signing is not the end of the questions. ContractIQ helps you navigate contracts already in force: understand each party's obligations, payment terms, service levels and dependencies, and review related schedules and amendments for conflicting wording.
Ask Frank follow-up questions about the agreement and check the clause references. Examine renewal provisions, notice periods and termination conditions, using repository renewal alerts to support planning. Verify important decisions and notice requirements against the complete agreement and qualified legal advice where needed.
- Understand your commitments under the signed agreement.
- Ask questions as they arise and check the agreed wording.
- Prepare for renewal, renegotiation or exit.
Evidence first, human decision always
ContractIQ links review prompts to the relevant clause and explains why the wording deserves attention. A finding is not a legal conclusion or a substitute for professional advice.
Use the evidence to ask a sharper question, involve the right owner and document why the organisation accepted, clarified or escalated an issue.
Read the cited wording with the people who own the commercial and operational outcome.
What a useful finding looks like
“Customer shall provide all assistance reasonably requested by Supplier. Any delay caused by Customer will extend the delivery date.”
The review question is practical: what assistance, by when, measured by whom, and how much can the delivery date move? Read this with the project plan, dependency schedule and delay remedy before deciding whether the protection is workable.
The same clause can be ordinary in a low-dependency purchase and material in a complex implementation. The deal team supplies the context an AI review cannot.
A focused next step
- Upload the complete draft and related schedules for a first evidence-backed review.
- Use clause references to bring legal, commercial and procurement owners into the decision.
- Confirm important findings against the governing law and the final signed document.